Wednesday, April 20, 2016

मोदीजी ने चादर चढा कर पूरा किया संकल्प “त्वदीयाय कार्याय बदधा कटीयं”



मोदीजी ने चादर चढा कर पूरा किया संकल्प “त्वदीयाय कार्याय बदधा कटीयं”

       मोदीजी ने अजमेर शरीफ पर श्री मुखतार अब्बास नकवी जी के द्वारा चादर चढवायी इसके लिए ख्वाजा मोइद्दीन चिश्ती के बारे में जानने की उत्सुकता ने मुझे जिन तथ्यों तक पहुँचाया, उन्हें आपके समक्ष रख रहा हूँ। कहा जाता है मोइउद्दीन चिश्ती ने
(१)  मोहम्मद गौरी को महारानी सयोंगिता का चित्र भेजा तथा भारत पर आक्रमण के लिए प्रेरित किया।
(२)  थानेश्वर के जलाशय, जहाँ पृथ्वीराज की सेना के पशु पानी पीते थे, उसमे जहर मिलवा दिया, जैसा अरब देशों में अक्सर युद्ध में किया जाता है।
(३)  तराइन के द्वितीय युद्ध के दौरान गौरी के कुतुबदीन ऐबक तथा अन्य सेनापतियों को महारानी सयोंगिता तथा अन्य राजपूत स्त्रियों के बलात्कार के लिए प्रेरित किया। इसके फलस्वरूप पृथ्वीराज एवं राजपूत सरदार युद्ध स्थल से स्त्रियों के शिविर की तरफ उनकी रक्षा हेतु लौटे एवं हिन्दू सेना शीघ्र ही परास्त हो गयी।
(४)  गौरी ने मोइउद्दीन चिश्ती को विजय के उपहार स्वरुप सयोंगिता को दिया, जिसे चिश्ती ने बलात्कार के उपरांत निर्वस्त कर मुस्लिम सैनिकों के आगे फैक दिया।
        प्रश्न उठता है कि क्या संघ के शिक्षाविदों ने किसी बौधिक में मोदीजी को ख्वाजा मोइद्दीन चिश्ती के बारे में क्या कभी नहीं बताया होगा। यदि मोदीजी को मोइद्दीन चिश्ती के बारे में पता था, तो वह क्या मजबूरी रही होगी जिसके फलस्वरूप भारत को दासता में जकड़ने के लिए जिम्मेदार व्यक्ति की दरगाह पर चादर चढाने की आवश्यकता पड़ गयी होगी। लाल कृष्ण आडवानी के जिन्ना पर दिए वक्तव्य पर तुरंत कार्यवाही करने वाले संघ की क्या मजबूरी रही होगी कि उसने मोदीजी से विचार–विमर्श करने की भी आवश्यकता नहीं समझी। क्या यह अल्पसंख्यक तुष्टिकरण एवं कोरी सत्ता लोलुपता नहीं है।
       क्या आप जानते हैं कि.... भारत भूमि पर आने वाला अधिकांश पाकिस्तानी राजनैतिक अजमेर शरीफ पर क्यों जाना चाहता है...??? जी हाँ... यह एक अजीब लेकिन बेहद कठोर सत्य है कि.. भारत भूमि पर आने वाला अधिकांश पाकिस्तानी राजनैतिक व्यक्ति अजमेर शरीफ जाने की इच्छा जरूर रखता है...! इसका कारण.... कोई राजनैतिक नहीं.... बल्कि.... विशुद्ध रूप से धार्मिक है...... और... वे अजमेर शरीफ इसीलिए जाना चाहते हैं कि..... वो ख्वाजा मोइद्दीन चिश्ती के इस्लाम के प्रति किये गए वफादारी.... और, हिन्दू को बरगला कर .... सेकुलर बनाने के लिए ..... वे मोइद्दीन चिश्ती का शुक्रिया अदा कर सकें....! इस बात को ठीक से समझने के लिए हमें हिन्दुराष्ट्र भारत ... और, मोइद्दीन चिश्ती का इतिहास समझना होगा...! सातवीं शताब्दी के मुहम्मद बिन कासिम और उसके बाद महमूद गजनवी तथा मुहम्मद गौरी तक मध्य एशिया के किसी भी मुस्लिम आक्रमणकारी के लाख प्रयासों के बाद भी..... उनका भारत भू को कब्जाने और इसे मुस्लिम राष्ट्र बनाने का स्वप्न पूरा नही हुआ...! और.... अगर हम ......ख्वाजा मुइउद्दीन चिश्ती के खंड काल पर दृष्टि डालें तथा तथ्यों को ध्यान से देखें तो पता चलता है कि... चिश्ती वह संत था , जो मुहम्मद गौरी के साथ भारत आया था ! यह बात निर्विवाद सत्य है कि..... भारत भूमि पर हुए अनेकों आक्रमण और अत्याचारों के बाद भी..... भारतीय हिन्दू धर्म और संस्कृति लोप नही किये जा सके.....!. भारतीय हिन्दू धर्म और संस्कृति को नष्ट करने के लिए ...... सांस्कृतिक आक्रमण का सहारा लिया गया ... जैसा कि आज भी लिया जा रहा है (जिसमे मीडिया, चर्च, राजनैतिक पार्टियां, लव जिहाद इत्यादि)........ चिश्ती भारतीय हिन्दू धर्म और संस्कृति को नष्ट करने के लिए चलाये गए सांस्कृतिक आक्रमण का प्रथम उपयोगकर्ता था.... या फिर यूँ कहें कि..... चिश्ती .... भारत के लिए पहला सांस्कृतिक आक्रमणकारी था...!!
        इसके उपरांत भी मोइद्दीन चिश्ती को एक संत के रूप में प्रस्तुत किया जाता रहा है. मुहम्मद गौरी जैसे एक दुर्दांत व्यक्ति के साथ संत माने जाने वाले व्यक्ति का होना बहुत सी शंकाओं को जन्म देता है...! आखिर एक संत (यदि वह संत है ) एक दुर्दांत रक्त पिपासु के साथ लंबी यात्रा कर के लाहौर से अजमेर तक पहुंचा और रास्ते मे हुए कत्ल-ए-आम से उसका संतत्व उसे जरा भी ना कटोचे.... यह कैसे संभव है....?????? हम हिन्दू .... सदा से ही संत व्यक्तियों ...... जो परोपकार हेतु जीते हैं.... को सम्मान देता आया है...और, उन्हें
आस्था और श्रद्धा की दृष्टि से देखते आये हैं...! हमारे इसी मानसिकता का लाभ सर्वप्रथम  मोइद्दीन चिश्ती ने उठाया. अपने प्रसिद्ध होने और लोगो की आस्था का उपयोग चिश्ती ने भारत मे मुस्लिमों के लिये बेस बनाने के लिये किया...... चिश्ती ने अजमेर मे अपना आश्रम खोला जहां प्रत्येक व्यक्ति को भोजन की व्यवस्था की गई...! क्योंकि.... चिश्ती जानता था कि.... जब तक भारतीय अपनी संस्कृति से जुडे रहेंगे तब तक उन्हे पराजित करना असंभव है...! उसने सर्वप्रथम यह किया कि.... हिंदू और मुस्लिमों के बीच मे एक कडी के रूप मे जुड गया...! इसी हेतु उसने अपने को एक चमत्कारी सूफी संत के रूप मे प्रचारित करना आरंभ किया...! अजमेर तत्कालीन राजपूतों की राजधानी था.....और, राजपूत वह जाति थी... जो, कभी भी विधर्मियों को स्वीकार नही करती थी...! चिश्ती ने हिंदू समाज में अपनी लोकप्रियता का लाभ ..... मुहम्मद गौरी को उसे जीत दिलाने में दिया. इसके लिए चिश्ती.....पृथ्वीराज चौहान से तिरस्कृत हो कर कहा कि..... मैने अजमेर की चाबी कहीं और सौंप दी है.... और, यह एक संकेत था... जिसे पा कर मुहम्मद गौरी ने पुनः भारत पर आक्रमण किया. अपनी विजय का श्रेय भी मुहम्मद गौरी ने...... चिश्ती को ही दिया.... और, अपने गुलाम कुतुबुद्दीन ऐबक को निर्देश दिया कि... वहां मंदिरों को तोड कर..... ढाई दिन मे मस्जिद बनाई जाये..... जो कि आज भी मौजूद है ... और वो मस्जिद आज भी अढाई दिन का झोपडा नाम से प्रचलित है...यदि चिश्ती संत ही था , तो वह....यह कैसे बर्दाश्त कर सका कि... कोई किसी दूसरे के आस्था के स्थानों को तोड कर वहां अपनी मस्जिदों का निर्माण करे....?
हिन्दू सेकुलर भी ...... खुद को वर्णसंकर (दोगला)...... प्रमाणित करने के लिए वहां जाते रहते हैं....!!
कहा जाता है मोइउद्दीन चिश्ती ने
(१)  मोहम्मद गौरी को महारानी सयोंगिता का चित्र भेजा तथा भारत पर आक्रमण के लिए प्रेरित किया।
(२)  थानेश्वर के जलाशय, जहाँ पृथ्वीराज की सेना के पशु पानी पीते थे, उसमे जहर मिलवा दिया, जैसा अरब देशों में अक्सर युद्ध में किया जाता है।
(३)  तराइन के द्वितीय युद्ध के दौरान गौरी के कुतुबदीन ऐबक तथा अन्य सेनापतियों को महारानी सयोंगिता तथा अन्य राजपूत स्त्रियों के बलात्कार के लिए प्रेरित किया। इसके फलस्वरूप पृथ्वीराज एवं राजपूत सरदार युद्ध स्थल से स्त्रियों के शिविर की तरफ उनकी रक्षा हेतु लौटे एवं हिन्दू सेना शीघ्र ही परास्त हो गयी।
(४)  गौरी ने मोइउद्दीन चिश्ती को विजय के उपहार स्वरुप सयोंगिता को दिया, जिसे चिश्ती ने बलात्कार के उपरांत निर्वस्त कर मुस्लिम सैनिकों के आगे फैक दिया।
(इस ब्लॉग का उद्देश्य किसी की भावनाओ को ठेस न पंहुचा कर अपितु सत्य को उजागर करना है)

Modiji presented “Chadar” to Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti at Ajmer Sarif via Sh. Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. It inspired me to know more about Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti and whatever I came to know, I am writing here. It is said Moiddin Chisti played a crucial  role in the defeat of Prithviraj as he

(i)          Invited Mohammad Ghori by sending portrait of Queen Sanyogita
(ii)        He got ponds near battle field where Rajput army was staying, poisoned so that animals and soldiers got ill.
(iii)       He advised Kutubddin Aibek to corner and rape Queen and other hindu women, so that King and Rajput Generals had to come for their rescue and thus the army got defeated.
(iv)      After Ghori presented Queen to Chisti, he threw here naked in front of muslim soldiers for a gang rape.

          Now the question arises, was Modiji not informed by the intellectual teachers of the SANGH in any of the BOUDHIKS (lecture sessions in the SANGH camps) . And if he knew about Moiddin Chisti, what was the compulsion of Modiji to present CHADAR at the DARGAH of a person responsible for the slavery of India. What could have been the compusions of the Sangh, which has acted almost immediately against Sh L K Avani on his statements regarding secularism of the Jinnah, that it (Sangh) felt no need even to discuss it with the Modiji. Isn’t it sheer power greediness and minority appeasement.


                Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti  is regarded as foremost preacher of Sufism among Sufis of India. the belief of Akbar, the mughal emperor that it was his  blessings which lead him a  son and the heir for the mughal throne started trend among people for fulfilling wishes by offering prayer at his mazar. Though people sings more about his miracles but very are few are aware of the fact about real stand of last Hindu ruler of our country Prithviraj Chauhan and Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti. Stories have been exaggerated to show Khwaja as mystic with high spiritual powers but truth is nonthe else. The belief of Khwaja in shariat and support to Muslim invader Muhammad Gori in establishment of Islamic rule in India clearly outlines his inclination towards Islam. We will take few examples from his life which creats doubts in our mind about his so called secular? Stand.The fawaidu’l –fu’ad says that when Khwaja arrived in Delhi from Lahore seven hundred people (Hindus), besides hamidu’din – din dihlawi, embrace Islam (ref- page 117 vol. 1 a history of Sufism in India –Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi). Khwaja Ajmer visit is mentioned as full of miracles (exaggerated stories). Since Khwaja arrival in Ajmer caused lot of disputes with prithviraj.
1.    Reaching there he decided to sit under a tree, but camel keepers ordered him away as the area belonged to the raj. (The truth was that camels keeping area was Prithviraj army area in which locals were not allowed. A story has been propagated that due to Khwaja wished that none of the camels were able to stand on their legs. It was only when rai’s officials came and pleaded for guilty Khwaja made them well. )
2.     The Khwaja and his followers moved to a place near the Anasagar Lake. His servants killed a cow and cooked kebabs for him. Some members of the khwaja’s party went to anasagar and the others to Pansela Lake for ablutions. There were one thousand temples on the two lakes. The Brahmans stopped the ablutions and the party complained to the Khwaja. He sent his servant to bring water for his ewer. As soon as the ewer touched the Pansela Lake, all the lakes, tanks and wells around became dry. The Khwaja went to the anasagar lake temple and asked the name of the idol. He was told it was called sawi deva. The Khwaja asked whether the idol had talked to them. On receiving a negative reply he made the idol recite kalmia and converted it into a human being, naming it sa’di. This caused a sensation in the town. Prithviraj ordered his Prime Minister Jaipal who was also a magician, to avert the evil influence of the Khwaja. Jaipal proceeded to fight the Khwaja with 700 magical dragons, 1500 magical discs and 700 disciples. The Khwaja drew a circle bringing his party within it under his protection, and succeeded in killing all the dragons and disciples. Pithaura and jaipal begged the Khwaja forgiveness. The Khwaja prayer restored water to the lakes, tanks and wells. A large number of people accepted Islam. Pithaura refused tom accept Islam and the Khwaja prophesied he would be handed over to the Islamic army.(ref- ali asghar chisti- jawahir-I faridi , Lahore 1884, pp.155-160 )
(The truth was that This area was considered as sacred by Hindus and killing cow who is also considered as sacred  was heinous crime. the visit of Khwaja to anasagar lake temple caused many controversies as Hindus were not in favor of cow meat eater. second if Khwaja was so powerful then why Muhammad Gori was defeated in first war against prithviraj chauhan, it was only in second war and that also along with combined forces of king jaichand, father of prithviraj wife sayogita helped Mohammad Gori  prithviraj lost the war. Rest all stories are myths in which no wise person will belief.)
3.    Sheikh nizamuddin-din auliya believed that when Khwaja muinuddin reached Ajmer, India was ruled by Pithaura rai (known as Prithvi Raj) and his capital was Ajmer. Pithaura and his high officials resented the sheik’s presence in their city, but the latter’s eminence and his apparent power to perform miracles, prompted them to refrain from taking action against him. A disciple of the khwaja’s was in the service of prithviraj rajs. After the disciple began o receive hostile treatment from the rajs, the Khwaja sent a message to Pithaura in favor of the Muslim. Pithaura refused to accept the recommendation, thus indicating his resentment of, the khwaja’s alleged claims to understand the secrets of the unseen. When Khwaja mu’inu’d-din heard of this reply he prophesied: “we have seized Pithaura alive and handed him over to the army of Islam.” about the same time sultan Muhammad Gori arrived from ghazna, attacked the forces of Pithaura and defeated them. Pithaura was taken alive and thus the khwaja’s prophesy was fulfilled. (Ref- amir khwurd, siyaru’l – auliya, delhi,1885,pp.45-47)
(The above reference is by a renowned Sufi nizamuddin auliya for another Sufi clears their stand for Islam. they are considered as preachers of brotherhood and humanity. the above reference exposes their attitude towards Hindus.)
                The dargah of Khwaja Moinudeen Chisti at ajmer was once a grand varaha temple. The temple was demolished with Chisti's influence. He was later buried there itself, as is the case with islamic invaders who destroyed temples and later converted them into mausoleums. Maybe hindus kept visiting the place of the original Vaaraha temple for its special location and continue to visit the dargah in ignorance now. However, the idol was secretly shifted to pushkar 8 kms away, and subsequently, with Rani ahilyabai Holkar's assistance was installed in a new temple. People visit the temple which is near the famous Varaaha ghat of pushkar lake. About 12 years before Hazrat khwaja moinuddin chisti came to india, prithviraj chauhan's mother had a dream, and she warned her son not to trust a sufi saint who would come in as a spy for an invader from the north. See how dreams become true, for Chisti was a spy for Mohammed ghori.
                Muhammad Ghori had Gorilla-like face which was disfigured with the small-pox to a degree that was a constant source of mortification to him, until it stimulated him to exertion, from a desire that the bad impression made by his appearance might be effaced by repeatedly raping beautiful Hindu Queens & castrating their beloved Hindu Husbands publicly. Ghori, besides being marked by small-pox, had an ill-favoured countenance, & knew it. He himself is said to have observed, after looking in the glass, that he saw so many faults in himself, so he was always ready to kill the Hindu men & rape their lovely wives. Ghori was tall, lean, athletic & his arms reaching down to his calves. Prithviraj court poet Vajishwara was at hand to witness ugly Ghori. Vajishwara writes of Muhammad Ghori:
“His face was like Gorilla and he had steel-like body. His eyes were so narrow and piercing that they might have bored a hole in a brazen vessel, and his stench was more horrible than his dark color. His head was completely bald and his cheeks resembled leather bottles full of wrinkles and knots. His nose was too long and his nostrils resembled rotting graves. His beard was of extravagant length, but he had no moustache. His chest was covered with lice which looked like sesame growing on a bad soil. His lean body, indeed, were covered with these insects, and his skin was as rough-grained as shagreen leather, fit only to be converted into shoes.”
                In 1190 Muhammad Ghori attacked the kingdom of Prithviraj and captured the frontier fort of Sarhind. While he was busy garrisoning the fort and arranging for his return to Ghazni, Muhammad learnt to his consternation that Prithviraj with his vast army was already marching against him.
Though his army was small, Muhammad Ghori resolved to strike the first blow and marched south to intercept the Chauhan army. At Tarain, near modern Thanesar, the two armies met in 1191. The Hindu elephants and cavalry came up to the contest—a javelin struck Muhammad Ghori in the shoulder, when he tried to kill Prithviraj and a Khalji soldier carried the swooning Sultan away to safety. When their commander fled the Muslim army broke down and fled after him. The combined arms (elephants, cavalry, infantry) force of Prithviraj chased after the enemy but the Turkish cavalry easily outpaced them. Sensing that the Muslims had escaped from the clutches of the Hindu army, Prithviraj stopped his futile chase. Hurriedly Prithviraj rushed back to Kannouj to marry its peerless princess, the gorgeous beauty Sanyogita. Victorious Prithviraj returned to his capital with his bride Sanyogita, while his other generals returned to their forts and towns to rest their army and replenish their equipment, elephants, and horses.   
In  second battle of terrain, the army of prithviraj chauhan consisted of  10,00,000 infantry, 7,00,000 archers, 3,00,000 cavalry and 3000 elephants, while the army of Muhammad Ghori consisted of  30,000 infantry, 40,000 archers, 50,000 cavalry and 90 elephants.
                Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti had told his followers that at Mecca that he was instructed by Mohammed, the prophet to convert hindus into islam. His sufi followers poisoned the lake waters from which the king's army elephants, horses and camels drank, as it was the standard warfare tactics in the deserts (poisoning the oasis waters). The lakes had to be emptied out manually due to rotting fish and the animals were weakened due to dysentry, when Ghori had to be battled.
                According to Historian Prof. Lane Pool “As for the battle of Tarain II, history squarely puts the blame of the defeat on fatty Prithviraj, the hot-headed, sensuous, amorous and arrogant commander of Hindu forces at Tarain — it was he who disregarded the advice given by his aged minister, that of keeping the women, away from the battlefield. the huge Hindu forces on the battlefield were massively hampered by the need to protect their beautiful womenfolk from Islamic rapes, and were consequently not able to fight effectively against the small Muslim army led by ugly”.
                It is said and is available in the literature that in the second battle, in 1192AD, as is said on the advice of Moiuddin Chisti,  Qutubuddin sneaked back & cornered Prithviraj’s beautiful buxom wife Queen Sanyogita. Ghori rushed there when he heard the news & proceeded to rape Sanyogita as he knew his small Muslim army would never defeat Prithviraj directly in the battle as his Hindu army was very vast & huge. Hindu Queen Sanyogita was repeatedly gang raped by Muhammed Ghori & Qutubuddin Aibak. Prithviraj Chauhan was dejected when he saw this happen & rushed out of his defensive position to fight Ghori. Prithviraj fought bravely with Ghori. As Qutubuddin was raping Sanyogita, Prithviraj got deviated on seeing this & using the chance, Ghori suddenly kicked at Prithviraj’s scrotum. Prithviraj fell down in agony of pain & panic. Physically, fat handsome Prithviraj was no match for sturdy hardy Ghori. So Ghori easily butchered & defeated Prithviraj. Ghori repeatedly raped voluptuous Sanyogita in front of her husband Prithviraj. Prithviraj begged Ghori to stop ravaging & raping his ravishing wife Sanyogita. Ghori asked Prithviraj to convert to Islam. Prithviraj refused promptly & bravely. Ghori asked Khwaja Moinuddin to do circumcision for Prithviraj. Khwaja forcibly did circumcision on Prithviraj’s thick penis. Then Khwaja forcibly placed beef into Prithviraj’s mouth. Prithviraj spat the beef out in disgust on Khwaja’s face. Prithviraj Chauhan refused to accept Islam even after all these tortures & haughtily spat on Ghori. In rage, Ghori gouged out Prithviraj’s eyes. Still Prithviraj refused to accept Islam & spat on Quran bravely. Angered Ghori butchered, beheaded & killed potent Prithviraj.
                When Prithviraj ’s severed head was presented to Khwaja moinuddin chisty, he sang: “We have conquered hindustan after enormous trouble”.  Prithviraj Chauhan was betrayed by Mohammad Ghori’s masterly strategy of jihad rape. This is how Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated, castrated, tortured, butchered, beheaded & killed.
                Ghori & his small Muslim army massacred the huge Hindu army of doomed Prithviraj. Panic & confusion spread through the ranks of the Hindus, & “this prodigious Hindu army, once shaken, like a great building tottered to its fall and was lost in its own ruins.” Fortune frowned on Prithviraj and Ghori carried death and destruction so desperately on the vast Hindu army of Prithviraj that by sunset there was complete collapse in his Hindu army. “For many miles the stricken field was covered with the Hindu flags, spears & shields, heaped metal-bows, jewelled steel-swords, gemmed helmets, exquisitely damascened gauntlets, chiselled greaves, golden breastplates, and saffron scarves, intermingled with the countless dead Hindus & got soaking wet in their cold blood.” After killing Prithviraj Chauhan in the second battle of Tarain, Muhammad Ghori used to line up thousands of Hindu men to get circumcised—stretch out the foreskin, slice with a knife and out—next guy! Then they had to eat beef. Many Hindus refused Islamic circumcision and the Muslims castrated them immediately & beheaded them later.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
It is said Moiddin Chisti played a crucial  role in all this defeat of Prithviraj as he
(i)          Invited Mohammad Ghori by sending portrait of Queen Sanyogita
(ii)        He got ponds near battle field where Rajput army was staying, poisoned so that animals and soldiers got ill.
(iii)       He advised Kutubddin Aibek to corner and rape Queen and other hindu women, so that King and Rajput Generals had to come for their rescue and thus the army got defeated.
(iv)      After Ghori presented Queen to Chisti, he threw here naked in front of muslim soldiers for a gang rape.
 (The above study is based on the following great works:  Prthviraja-vijaya of Jayanka;
Prthviraja Raso of Chand Bardai, Hammira Mahakavya of Nayachandra Suri;  Prabandha-cintamani of Merutunga, Viruddhavidhi-viddhavamsa of Laksmidhar; Kharataragaccha-pattavali of Jinapala; 
Tabaqat-i Nasiri by Minhaj-i-Siraj; Tarikh-i-Rashidi by Mirza Haider; Tarikh-i-Firishta by Ferisht;, Gulshan-i Ibrahim by Muhammad Qasim)
Modiji presented “Chadar” to Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti at Ajmer Sarif via Sh. Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. It inspired me to know more about Khwaja Muinuddin Chisti and whatever I came to know, I am writing here. It is said Moiddin Chisti played a crucial  role in the defeat of Prithviraj as he

(i)                   Invited Mohammad Ghori by sending portrait of Queen Sanyogita
(ii)                 He got ponds near battle field where Rajput army was staying, poisoned so that animals and soldiers got ill.
(iii)               He advised Kutubddin Aibek to corner and rape Queen and other hindu women, so that King and Rajput Generals had to come for their rescue and thus the army got defeated.
(iv)               After Ghori presented Queen to Chisti, he threw here naked in front of muslim soldiers for a gang rape.

          Now the question arises, was Modiji not informed by the intellectual teachers of the SANGH in any of the BOUDHIKS (lecture sessions in the SANGH camps) . And if he knew about Moiddin Chisti, what was the compulsion of Modiji to present CHADAR at the DARGAH of a person responsible for the slavery of India. What could have been the compusions of the Sangh, which has acted almost immediately against Sh L K Avani on his statements regarding secularism of the Jinnah, that it (Sangh) felt no need even to discuss it with the Modiji. Isn’t it sheer power greediness and minority appeasement.

  (The aim of writing this blog is not to hurt the feelings of any individual but to spread the truth)


Tuesday, April 12, 2016

MARX WILL CRY BITTERLY IF MEET INDIAN COMMUNISTS; THE MURDERERS OF COMMUNISM IN INDIA




MARX WILL CRY BITTERLY IF MEET INDIAN COMMUNISTS; THE MURDERERS OF COMMUNISM IN INDIA
What is Marxism: An introduction
Marxism is an economic and social system based upon the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. While it would take veritably volumes to explain the full implications and ramifications of the Marxist social and economic ideology, Marxism is summed up in the Encarta Reference Library as “a theory in which class struggle is a central element in the analysis of social change in Western societies.” Marxism is the antithesis of capitalism which is defined by Encarta as “an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and distribution of goods, characterized by a free competitive market and motivation by profit.” Marxism is the system of socialism of which the dominant feature is public ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange.
            Under capitalism, the proletariat, the working class or “the people,” own only their capacity to work; they have the ability only to sell their own labor. According to Marx a class is defined by the relations of its members to the means of production. He proclaimed that history is the chronology of class struggles, wars, and uprisings. Under capitalism, Marx continues, the workers, in order to support their families are paid a bare minimum wage or salary. The worker is alienated because he has no control over the labor or product which he produces. The capitalists sell the products produced by the workers at a proportional value as related to the labor involved. Surplus value is the difference between what the worker is paid and the price for which the product is sold.
The capitalist partially uses the surplus value to enrich himself by buying the real state and more of factories and partially to better his means of production and mechanization. By doing the second thing i.e. improving his means of production and mechanization, he now needs lesser number of workers. This increases unemployment and a lowered value of wage or salary, which worker has no option but to accept, to meet out the needs of his livelihood. 
This decreased wage or salary and unemployment results in a decreased purchasing powerof the society, which according to Marx consists of capitalist class and the labor or worker’s class only.  A decreased purchasing power leads to a decreased production which again leads to further unemployment and lowering of wages (or salary). This cycle continues. Capitalist keeps on increasing his wealth and workers become poorer and poorer. Therefore finally working class revolts and overthrows the capitalist. Therefore, the capitalism, in the words of Marx, posses the seeds of its own destruction.
            Therefore, according to Marx, a proletariat (of workers) or socialist revolution is sure to occur. The state now which is under the control of a dictatorship regime of the proletariat, will take away the control of the assets and means of production (by which the former ruling class of capitalists was forcibly maintaining the rule over the working class). Therefore, the state which is now a dictatorship regime of the proletariat becomes the real owner of all the farms, factories and everything within the territory of the country. Soon, the Communism evolves from socialism out of this progression: the socialist slogan is “From each according to his ability, to each according to his work”. The communistslogan varies thusly: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”. Therefore, in communism, a worker with a family of four will get double and a larger house than one with a family of two. All are workers of the state. No human being will work under   

any other human being. No private servants, no private property, no private job and no private ownership.  State or the government (of the working class) is the only owner of all farm, factories and human beings.
What were the Marxist views of religion?
Because the worker under the capitalist regimes are miserable and alienated, religious beliefs are sustained. Religion, according to Marx was the response to the pain of being alive, the response to earthly suffering. In Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (1844), Marx wrote, “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the feeling of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless circumstances.” Marx indicated in this writing that the working class, the proletariat was a true revolutionary class, universal in character and acquainted with universal suffering. Working class is told about the religion that their sufferings are the result of their past deeds or the deeds of their previous birth. They should suffer and get their sins dissolved. Thus religion works as opium against the proletariat (or working class) revolution and tries to make workers non-revolutionary (or coward). But how Indian communists think Islam a progressive and workers friendly religion, is beyond understanding. Is the suffering of Hindu or a high caste workers is not a suffering. How a believer of Karl Marx can be an anti- Hindu or (pro-islamic) or a casteist fellow. Can the proletariats be divided into caste and religions? This is the antithesis or anti –Marxism that has led to the failure of communism in India. You want to work in a country of 80% hindus and always abusing Hinduism, and expect to be successful. This is impossible. Are communists of China or Russia, in the name of unity of prolectariats,  ever worked against the interest of their nation or did they worked against Christianity (in Russia) or Bodhism (in China). Never. You cannot survive by doing so. Religion is an opium and so is Islam, indian communists will never understand this. Heroes of this country are those who faught against Islam (such as Prithviraj Chauhan, Maharana Pratap or Shivaji Maharaj) in the medieval period or are the nationalist soldiers fighting at the border in the present times. Anti-Hinduism, Anti-Nationalism is not Marxism, at least and is a doomed to die ideology.
 Let us see how communists always allied with Muslim fundamentalists
MUSLIMS AND INDIAN COMMUNISTS - Strange Allies? (with thanks R.Upadhyay, Paper NO. 1107, 01/09/2004)
Ideologically, the Muslim communalists and Godless Communists are poles apart in their worldview. It is however said that Muslim communalists often used the cadres of the Communist Party of India (CPI) as their point men in furtherance of their communal grievances. Who used whom may be a debatable question but the experience of their political game in this country shows that they fought jointly against the nationalist forces, which were their common target.  
Communists are known for speaking in many voices if it suits their interest. Contrary to the Marxian dictum -'religion is the opium of people' their softness towards the religious obscurantism of the Muslims exposed their intellectual hypocrisy and puzzled the people of India. Gradually both of the Communists and Muslim communalists became strange allies perhaps due to some under mentioned resemblance in their character, which served as common link to bring them together: Both the Communists and the Muslim communalists are internationalists in character. The Communists attempt to 'ape Russia and China' for everything. It is said, if there is rain in Moscow or China, Indian Communists open their umbrellas. The Muslim Communalists on the other hand are emotionally attached to Perso-Arabic socio-culture with Saudi Arabia as their international centre.  None of them ever opposed collaborative relation between China and Pakistan, which was basically to precipitate chaotic conditions in secular India.  None of them believe in the concept of common nationalism. For Communists Indian nationalism is bourgeois nationalism but Russian/Chinese nationalism for them is proletarian nationalism.  "Once the Marxist bug bites a person, he dumps nationalism and cuts himself off from his civilisational heritage" (Dina Nath Mishra in Pioneer dated August 22, 2004). For Muslim communalists Indian nationalism denotes religious nationalism of Hindus but Arab nationalism is Islamic nationalism for them. The Communists called the nationalist leaders of freedom movement as Hindu bourgeois whereas the Muslims called them Hindu leaders. The Communists believe only in state that is the legal and geographical association of people. Being the limbs of international Communist movement they do not recognise national boundary of India. The Muslim communalists too believe in pan-Islamism in which there is no place for motherland. As supranationalists they do not have faith in nationalism.  Patriotic association that constitutes a nation with common heritage and culture in which hearts and minds move in one direction is not acceptable to either of them.  For both of them the concept of nationalism is synonymous to Hinduism and therefore they opposed the efforts of nationalist forces to promote its spirit among the countrymen during freedom movement. Hate-Hindu campaign became a common link between them and they jointly targeted the nationalist forces as their common enemy.  The Communists described the nationalist movement for freedom as collaboration of National Bourgeoisie with 'fascism' and therefore supported the war efforts of 'British Bureaucracy' ', which they had earlier called 'British Imperialist'. The Muslim League too supported the war efforts of the British.  
The Communists floated multi-national theory in support of two-nation theory propagated by the Muslim League
Theoretically both of them believe in social equality but in practice they purge their opponents once they are in political power. Both believe in social equality but consider their own concept on this issue perfect. "Both Muslims and Communists regard their own concept of social structure perfect" (Dalwai in Muslim politics in India). Both claim themselves to be democratic in character but do not allow freedom of thought. Both of them justify use of violence to propagate their doctrine.  While the Muslims are supposed to work for a united 'Ummat' (Muslim community) for whole world, the Communists' slogan is to 'unite the workers of the world'.  The political objective of the Communists is to establish the 'dictatorship of proletariat' even though they have hardly produced any leader of proletariat origin in last over seven decades of existence in this country. Communists' leadership continued to remain confined to English educated minority group, who remained unconscious of the pre-medieval glorious history of India.  To run down the pre-medieval heritage and culture of this ancient land emerged as their common programme.  Communism failed everywhere in the world, but its followers in India are still hoping against hope to revive it by entrenching the Indian polity with their divisive tactics. Similarly the Islamic revivalists in India also believe that only Muslims are capable to govern this country and are hopeful of the revival of Muslim era. Late Dr.Sayed Mahmood, being projected by Muslim intelligentsia as a nationalist Muslim had said, "It is quite well known that Hindus are incapable of ruling a country. This is what history has proved adequately. We are going down the drain as a nation because Muslims in this country have no share in power. Only Muslims can save this nation from doom"(Muslim Politics in India by Hamid Dalwai, page 63). It was a historical coincidence that the Communist movement followed the Muslim communalists' movement for separatism launched during the freedom struggle against British colonialism. 
Ever since the Communist Party of India (CPI) was born in mid 1920s it had been trying to keep the Muslim mind confused over pre-Islamic past of this country. The Communists equated the controversial Aryan invasion theory as well as forceful eviction of Dravidians to the South that was propounded by the historians of the West with the Muslim invaders and persecution of the Hindus. Banking on the European account of Indian History the Communists argue that if Muslim invaders like Arabs, Turks, Central Asians, Afghans or Persians were outsiders, Hindus too were not the indigenous people of this land as they were also the descendants of Aryan invaders from outside? They rationalised the violent entry of Islam in India at the point of sword justifying the peace even with violent means. Their understanding of Indian history is that Islam gave new life to the broken antiques of Indian civilisation by providing social equality to oppressed masses (Selected Works of M.N.Roy edited by Sibnarayan Ray, Oxford, 2000, Volume IV).  Controversial historical accounts worked as lifeline for Muslim communalists in their movement for a separate national and political identity. Running down the pre-medieval past of Hindu civilisation the Communists also wrote unrealistic history in favour of beef eating in Vedic period. Such anti-Hindu thesis encouraged the Muslims to maintain an uncompromising attitude towards the sentiments of the Hindu majority. Known for their strong opposition to the civilisational ethos of Bharat, both of them worked with common goal to dilute the collective consciousness of the Indian people of their glorious heritage, culture and thousands of years of traditions.  M.N.Roy, one of the founder members of Communist Party of India (CPI) said that Indian masses oppressed under Brahmanical orthodoxy facilitated the Islamic invaders and "readily rallied under the banner of Islam which offered them social equality if not political equality" (Selected Works of M.N.Roy edited by Sibnarayan Ray, Oxford, 2000, Volume IV, page 398). He added, "the Mohammedan power was consolidated in India not so much by the velour of invaders' arms as owing to the propagation of the Islamic faith and the progressive significance of Islamic laws" (Ibid. Page 400). This is however, not correct. Mohammad Gauri, Mehmood Gaznavi or Babur were not invited by Dalits (or the oppressed castes). There is no historical evidence to support this theory. He (Mr. M.N.Roy) accused the Hindus for allegedly being contumelious towards Islam. He said, "Hindus superciliousness towards the religion and culture of Muslims is absurd. It insults history and injures the political future of the country … Learning from the Muslims, Europe became the leader of modern civilisation … Unfortunately India could not fully benefit by the heritage of Islamic culture because she did not deserve the distinction …  Knowledge of Islam's contribution would shock the Hindus out of their arrogant self-satisfaction" (Selected Works of M.N.Roy edited by Sibnarayan Ray, Oxford, 2000, Volume IV, page 401).  Therefore on one side he want to say Hindus brought Islam and on the other side, he says Hindus have superciliousness towards the religion and culture of Muslims. Only an Insane person can propose this type of thesis. However, most of communists in India, believe him as a great thinker. 
Historically, Stalin formulated the strategy to spread the hegemony of communists over West Asia to neutralise the influence of America in the region and wanted the support of Israel but the latter did not respond to him favourably. The followers of Stalin in India therefore started supporting the Muslim world against Israel.  Had Israel accepted Stalin's proposal the CPI might have taken a different stand on this issue. They opposed Israel's occupation of West Bank and Gaza but never raised any voice against Chinese occupation to Tibet. Isn’t it anti- nationalism. Do they think proletariats of India are fools.
 Communists wanted to convert the freedom movement into 'people's war' in alliance with the Muslim League against the nationalist forces. In 1940 the CPI came closer to All India Muslim League (AIML), when the latter emerged as a mass organisation of the second largest religious community in India. With hate-Hindu campaign as a common link they targeted the nationalist forces, as common enemy on the dictum of enemy's enemy is friend. "Since 1940 the CPI had tried to 'placate' the Muslim League, equating it with the Congress party as India's two mass political organisations" (Communism in Indian Politics by Bhabani Sen Gupta, Columbia University Press, 1972). The nationalist forces led by the Congress on the other hand evaluated the Communists as "anti-nationalist foreign agents" (Ibid), who followed the "just" demand of Muslim League for Pakistan. Contrary to Communists strong reservation against religion based State (religion is opium and anti-revolutionary concept), they supported the communal demand of AIML for creation of Pakistan. They provided intellectual support to the two-nation theory of AIML by floating multi-national theory. Isn’t it anti- nationalism. Do they think proletariats of India are fools.
The CPI's resolution adopted in its central committee meeting in September 1942 suggests the conviction of the party on communal division of India. The resolution said: "Every section of the Indian people which has its contiguous territory as its homeland, common historical tradition, common language, culture, psychological make-up, and common economic life would be recognised as a distinct nationality with the right to exist as an autonomous state within the free Indian Union or federation and will have the right to secede from it if it may so desire" (Selected Works of M.N.Roy 1932-1936, Volume IV). Non-participation of the Communists in Quit India Movement against the colonial oppression was the opportunism of the worst kind. It was apparently their tactical alliance with Muslim League to "precipitate nation-wide disintegration". Their desired objective was not only to break India into Hindu India and Muslim India but also into various linguistic and ethnic nations with sovereign political entity. Isn’t it anti- nationalism. Do they think proletariats of India are fools.
The main obstacle of the CPI against its movement was the Indian National Congress, a nationalist party that had a strong mass following during freedom movement. Therefore, it described the Congress as party of Indian National Bourgeoisie and preferred a tactical alliance with AIML, which it had also described a party of Indian Muslim Bourgeoisie. The CPI infiltrated its Muslim members into AIML with a view to weaken the greater bourgeois Congress by supporting smaller bourgeois. The All India Student Federation members of Aligarh Muslim University also joined All India Muslim Students Federation (Legacy of a Divided Nation by Mushirul Hasan, 1997, page 113). The Aligarh School of Muslim orthodoxy that supported the British imperialism against the forces of Indian nationalists got a natural political ally in CPI, which had also supported the war efforts of the colonial power. The experience of Muslim politics in India therefore, suggests that the modernist Muslims of Aligarh School were more prone to Muslim orthodoxy and communal politics than of Deoband School. Isn’t it anti- nationalism and anti-Hinduism. The country has 80% Hindu proletariats. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools.
"The most grotesque decision was to send its (CPI) Muslim members to enter the ranks of Muslim League"(Pakistan: Military Rule or People's Power by Tariq Ali, London 1970, page 31)". " The CPI had entered the Muslim League in order to strengthen the bourgeois faction in the League against the feudal landlords, a plan perfectly in keeping with Stalin's theory of revolution by stages" (Ibid. Page 32). "The manifesto of the Punjab Muslim League was written by a well known Indian Communist lawyer, Daniyal Latifi"(Ibid.). The CPI while supporting the division of India even appreciated the Muslim League's co-operative attitude towards the British war efforts against Hitler, which it had earlier termed as 'Imperialist War'. Its support to Pakistan movement therefore was a support to Muslim separatism. For the CPI loyalty to Soviet Russia was more important than to free the country from the British. Their support to British war efforts was factually a response to the call of Soviet Russia to the Communists all over the world following Hitler's attack on it. The CPI leaders supported Pakistan movement by organising processions and demonstrations in its favour. "In mid forties E.M.S. Namboodaripad led processions of Muslims along with A.K.Gopalan (both of them were leaders of the CPI) shouting 'Pakistan Zindabad' and 'Mophlastan Zindabad'. No wonder, therefore, that Khwaja Ahmed Abbas, himself a leftist, had to say that India was killed by the CPI which provided the Muslim separatists with an ideological basis" (Pakistan: From Jinnah to Jehad by S.K.Datta and Rajeev Sharma, 2002, Page 18). Isn’t it anti- nationalism and anti-Hinduism. In fact, this is also against the ideology of Karl Marx also and was aimed at the division of proletariats. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools
India was partitioned but the CPI did not get any dividend to establish dictatorship of proletariat. The party cadres were badly treated by Muslim League Government in Pakistan and were uprooted from there. "Pakistan dealt with Communists very sternly. Dr.Ashraf and Mr. Sajjad Zahir who went to Pakistan from India to give a momentum to communist movement there landed up directly in jail. It took ten years to get out of jail and they chose to return to India" (Muslim Politics in India by Hamid Dalwai, Hind Pocket Books, page 58). The CPI did not take any lesson from the treatment its cadres received in Pakistan. Instead they adopted a new strategy to reiterate the dangers of Hindu nationalists in post-partition India and induced a fear psychosis in the Muslim masses, who stayed back in India. They carried forward the legacy of their alignment with AIML and launched a systematic campaign to mould national opinion to justify the communal grievances of the Muslims by maintaining a hard attitude against the cultural tradition of India. They continued supporting the historical violence perpetrated by Islamic invaders and subsequent Muslim rulers on the Hindu natives as a part of policy to placate the Muslim communalists. They never raised any voice against the obsessed mindset of feudal and elite section of Muslims for political domination over the Hindus rather preferred to glorify the Islamic rule in the country.  Isn’t it anti- nationalism and anti-Hinduism. In fact, this is also against the ideology of Karl Marx also and was aimed at the division of proletariats. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools.
The Congress exploited the so-called fear of Hindu Rashtra induced in Muslim masses and used them as their vote bank to remain in power. The Communists were however rewarded by Jawahar Lal Nehru the first Prime Minister of the country by accommodating them in various academic power plants as main operators. He took their help to uproot the concept of integrated nationalism for unity and integrity of the country and floated a concept of composite culture. Taking advantage of Nehru's benevolence and shelter in his 'secular' umbrella, the Communists infiltrated their red cardholders into Congress to help the Muslim orthodoxy for reviving their movement for communal separatism in the name of religious identity. This attitude of the Communists also helped in obstructing the assimilation of Muslim masses in national mainstream.  Marxist historians, who maintained their hegemony in authoring the school textbooks during long period of Congress rule, masked the barbaric role of Muslim invaders in India and were reticent to portray their bigotry against the Hindus. They preferred to paint destruction of Hindu temples more for economic motivation than iconoclasm. Portraying the exclusivist and totalitarian ideology of communalist Muslims as ideology for social equality they feel proud in tarnishing the cultural tradition of this country.  It became a ritual for them to denounce Hindu nationalists as major cause behind any communal riot. They however, closed their eyes when there was a nation level war cry against Supreme Court verdict in Shahbano case.   Isn’t it anti- nationalism and anti-Hinduism. In fact, this is also against the ideology of Karl Marx also and was aimed at the division of proletariats. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools
In post-colonial India too the aspiration of the Muslim communalists for distinct and sovereign political identity remained intact. Both the CPI and the CPIM supported such mindset of Muslim communalists by giving substantial share of political power to Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), the post-partition incarnation of AIML in coalition Government in Kerala. They also "worked together with IUML to create a new Muslim majority district in Malabar and named it Malapuram"(Communism in Indian Politics by Bhabani Sen Gupta, Columbia University Press, 1972,Page 188). In 1980s Indian Muslims gave moral support to U.S.A. in its military adventure against Soviet occupation of Afghanistan but the CPI and the CPIM remained indifferent on this issue. They however, fully supported the Indian Muslims in their war cry against American attack on Taliban Government in Afghanistan in the new millennium. 
The Muslims of West Bengal aligned with Communists particularly the CPIM since the decline of Congress in mid 1960s. On the eve of 1969 midterm Assembly election, the state secretariat of the party received reports from all of its district units, which "revealed one common feature - that the agriculture labour and poor peasants, non-Bengali workers, and Muslim masses have in a big way swung towards the United Front especially to the CPI (M)"(Communism in Indian Politics by Bhabani Sen Gupta, Columbia University Press, 1972, Page 247).  The secret of Marxist Government in West Bengal lies with the electoral support of the Muslims, who constitute about twenty-five percent of the electorate. It recommended deletion of certain discussions about medieval period. "In 1989 the West Bengal Secondary Board under a Marxist Government issued a circular dated 28 April 1989 (Number Syl/89/1) which recommended the deletion of most discussions about the medieval period because it was too controversial" (Islamisation of Pakistan by Y.C.Ross, 2003, New Delhi, page 16-17). Its silence over unabated Muslim infiltration from Bangladesh is only to improve its votes even at the cost of national interest. Communist regime in West Bengal and Tripura allowed infiltration of Muslims from Bangladesh. Even today the Marxists are behaving like a proxy government and forcing the UPA Government for 'detoxification' of Indian history only to please the Muslims.  Isn’t it anti- nationalism and anti-Hinduism. In fact, this is also against the ideology of Karl Marx also and was aimed at the division of proletariats. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools
The cozy relation of Communists with Muslim/Christians shows their preference to the authoritarian concept of religious exclusivism than the democratic concept of Hinduism that believes in the concept of religious inclusivism. "In an interview to the Hindu (Hindu dated 15 August, 2004) Communist Party of India (Marxist) Polit Bureau member Prakash Karat said, “there was a national trend of various Christian denominations to talk to the CPIM and invite its leaders to forums of the Church". Even today the UPA Government under the pressure of Communists stopped the publication of a book on the contribution of primary teachers in freedom movement, which was to be published by the H.R.D. Ministry of previous NDA Government (Pioneer dated August 17, 2004). The agenda of the Leftists is seemingly not only to placate the communalist Muslims but also to provide uninterrupted lifeline to them for pursuing their movement for separatism. Their confrontation with nationalist historians on this issue still continues. Muslim historians of Pakistan on the other hand re-wrote the history textbooks for school with hate-Hindu actions of Muslims as triumph of Islam over Kafirs (Non-believers).  The experience of over last 57 years of Independence shows that the Communists in alliance with Muslim communalists constantly believed "the medieval period of Islamic ascendancy in south Asia as part of their historical legacy". They did not like to understand the reality that Indian sub-continent had to pay heavy price of losing the lives of its 1.5 million population for it. They did not realise that creation of modern political nationality in India could be possible only due to preservation of the thousands of years of collective consciousness towards spiritual and cultural unity of this country which was a remote possibility in Islamic India. Instead of strengthening this reality they preferred to amalgamate the power hungry forces together as 'liberal bourgeois', who are popularly known as 'secularists'. As a part of power politics the forces of liberal 'bourgeois' encouraged the movement for Muslim communalism which provoked the traditionally tolerant Indian society to revive the movement for Hindutva. Isn’t their ideology was totally  anti-Hinduism. Do they think proletariats of India, 80% of them being Hindus are fools.

Anti-RSS and Anti-Hindutva Ideology
If one examines the charge of fascist in the media and press of India, it is a standard term of abuse against the RSS and its associates, notably the BJP and now Prime Minister Narendra Modi, extending to almost any Hindu affirmative organisation. It is seldom used for any other political group or religion, not even for recognised terrorist organisations like the ISIS.
This is not surprising because the anti-Hindu Left retains a strong place in journalism and academia, which became entrenched during the long period of the Congress rule. We must remember that India's Left holds positions far to the left of mainstream liberal political parties in the West, and uses the rhetoric of the communist era. The Left is upset that it is losing power since Modi's unexpected landslide election in 2014 and will do what it can to discredit his attempts to benefit the country.
The Left has long used the term fascist to denigrate its enemies, much as the old Christian church called non-Christians "heathens" and "heretics". Even warring Leftist groups call their conflicting Leftist opponents fascists. European Leftists call the United States a fascist country. The far Left in America calls the Republican right fascist. Such emotionally charged terms are used to make us stop thinking and condemn the groups so designated without further consideration. Perhaps the best definition of fascist is any group that someone on the Left dislikes and wants to denigrate. For India's Left that group is the Hindus. Even yoga in India, because of its Hindu connections, is looked down upon suspiciously as Right wing.
The Left has produced the same type of violence, genocide and stifling of democracy associated with fascism. Joseph Stalin was as bad as Adolf Hitler and worse than Mussolini, killing millions of his own countrymen. Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler in 1939, which cruelly divided Poland between them. This started World War II and allowed Hitler to invade France without the fear of a second front with the Soviets. It was only Hitler's invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 that ended Stalin's nexus with the Nazis. Yet the Left conveniently forgets Stalin's alliance with Hitler that decimated Poland and started World War II.
Mao Tse Tung in China was another communist leader whose policies of dictatorship and state control rival the best of fascists. Millions died, numerous books were burned, and universities throughout the country were closed down under Mao's cultural revolution from 1966-76. Yet in India, the Left never made an issue of Mao's atrocities. Some Leftists defend India's own Maoists and the violence they commit.
Chinese communists call the Dalai Lama a fascist and India's Marxists support them. Soviet and Chinese communists as atheists destroyed numerous churches, temples and mosques. The Left prefers to criticise Hindus for religious intolerance, though Hindus have never invaded or tried to convert any country. It has no regard for Hindus in Pakistan, who have almost no political or human rights and are being wiped out altogether. The Left is anti-Israeli to the point of anti-Semitism, in spite of the Jewish holocaust being the main act defining Nazi brutality. Those who sympathies with Israel in any way are likely to be called fascist, and growing attacks on Jews in Europe arouse little concern from the Left.
Left-oriented Indira Gandhi and her Congress party abrogated freedom of the press and democracy under the Emergency she imposed during 1975-1977. Shall we cite her for policies that for Hindu leaders would certainly be called fascist? And for communal violence, the attack on the Sikhs after her assassination remains the largest genocide since the Independence of the country.
Another hero of the Indian Left is Lalu Prasad Yadav, who kept Bihar backward and lawless under his many years of rule. Lalu was convicted and has served time in prison. Those who claim to stand against fascism, communalism and corruption have a political alliance with him in Bihar today.
Certainly there is little called fascist that Leftist leaders have not done. And the Left in India still does not adequately condemn its own despots. Now the Left is criticising Hindus not for alleged terrorist events, but for isolated incidents over cow slaughter, which have occurred for years. We are told that beef banning Hindu groups pose the greatest threat to communal harmony. This borders on the absurd, particularly given the current situation in the Middle East, where multiple civil wars and devastating terrorist attacks are ongoing, and where there are no Hindus!
Of course, no one is beyond scrutiny or criticism. But the Left has its own set of failings and cannot claim to be the voice of truth and justice for humanity. The selective outrage of the Indian Left that targets Hindus has a political bias and is covering over a greater violence of naxalism, which the Left has often encouraged. According to reports communists under the name of naxalite movement have slaughtered over 13,300 security personnel and civilians since 1980. Do they represent democratic or civilized people, deserving a freedom to speak?  The answer is absolutely no. They are not only the enemies of Hinduism but  of the whole humanity. They are uncivilized, non-democratic and present day draculas of the peaceful indian society of Hindus and Budhists. They are out to destroy the culture and basic values of the society they are living in. They are the cancerous cells in the body of this nation, out to eat up the nation itself. They in no way represent Karl Marx, Lenin or Mao-tse-Tung or any type of communism but in fact, are the murderers of the communist ideology in India.
(Our aim to write this blog is to speak the true facts about Indian communists and we regret if it hurt the feelings of any individual)

बलात्कार: जिहाद का हथियार

बलात्कार :जिहाद का हथियार जिहाद दुनिया का सबसे घृणित कार्य और सबसे निंदनीय विचार है .लेकिन इस्लाम में इसे परम पुण्य का काम बताया गया है .जिह...